Obama’s Plan to Rejoin the World Community
By Phyllis Schlafly
When
candidate Barack Obama declared himself a “citizen of the world” before
thousands of cheering German socialists, and later pledged to “rejoin the World
Community,” those weren’t just his usual platitudes about “change.” Those words sounded the trumpet for his
specific and far-reaching globalist agenda.
Obama plans to use his presidential power to get the Democratic-majority
Senate to ratify a series of United Nations (UN) treaties that would take
us a long way toward global rule over our money, our
laws,
our military, our courts, our customs, our trade, and even our use of energy.
Here are the treaties he says he wants.
The
UN Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), which Reagan rejected in 1982, is
high on Obama’s list. LOST has already created the
International Seabed Authority (ISA) in Jamaica and given it total regulatory
jurisdiction over all the world’s oceans and all the riches on the ocean floor.
Corrupt
foreign dictators dominate LOST’s
global bureaucracy, and the U.S. would have the same vote as Cuba. Likewise for LOST’s International Tribunal in
Even
worse, LOST gives the ISA the power
to levy international taxes. The real
purpose of the taxing power is to compel the United States to spend billions of
private-enterprise dollars to mine the ocean floor and then let ISA bureaucrats
transfer our wealth to socialist, anti-American nations.
Next
on Obama’s list is the Comprehensive
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which was signed by Bill Clinton but rejected by
the Senate in 1999. It would prohibit
all nuclear explosive testing and thereby allow our nuclear arsenal to
deteriorate until the American people are defenseless against rogue regimes
such as Iran and North Korea.
A
new Global Warming Treaty is starting
to be written at the UN Climate Change Conference in Poland in order to replace
the Kyoto Agreement which George W.
Bush and our Senate refused to ratify. The
new treaty would force dramatic reductions in our use of energy, i.e., our
standard of living, and impose the “strong international norms” that Obama
seeks.
Obama
is toadying to his feminist friends by pushing ratification of the UN Treaty on Women, known as CEDAW. It was signed by Jimmy Carter in 1980 and
persistently promoted by Hillary Clinton, but the Senate has so far had the
good judgment to refuse to ratify it.
This
treaty would require us “to modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct
of men and women,” to follow UN dictates about “family education,” to revise
our textbooks to conform to feminist ideology in order to ensure “the
elimination of any stereotyped concept of the roles of men and women,” and to
set up a federal “network of child-care facilities.”
Article
16 would require us to allow women “to decide number and spacing of their
children.” Everyone recognizes this as feminist jargon for a UN obligation to
allow abortion on demand.
Like
all UN treaties, the UN Treaty on Women
creates a monitoring commission of so-called “experts” to ensure compliance. The monitors of the Treaty on Women have already singled out Mother’s Day as a
stereotype that must be eliminated.
Another
UN Treaty on the list is the UN Treaty on
the Rights of the Child, which was signed in 1995 by Bill Clinton but
wisely never ratified by our Senate. This
is a pet project of the people who believe that the ‘village’ (i.e., the
government or UN ‘experts’) should raise children rather than their parents.
This
treaty would give children rights against their parents and society to express
their own views “freely in all matters,” to receive information of all kinds
through “media of the child’s choice,” to use their “own language,” and to have
the right to “rest and leisure.” This
treaty even orders our schools to teach respect for “the Charter of the United
Nations.”
These
Obama-endorsed treaties, every one of which would be a dramatic encroachment on
U.S. sovereignty, would be supplemented by trade agreements negotiated by Obama’s
Trade Representative, Ron Kirk. He is an
enthusiastic supporter of the “global economic community” (which means open
borders for ‘free’ trade), of NAFTA, and even of the NAFTA Super Highway, which
he calls the “true river of trade between our communities.”
Every
UN treaty would interfere with self-government over some aspect of our lives
and would transfer significant power to foreign bureaucrats, many of whom
hate and envy America. Obama’s UN treaties are the enemy of U.S. political
and social independence, and Kirk’s global economic community is the enemy
of good middle-class American jobs.
![]()
Phyllis
Schlafly has been a national leader of the conservative movement since the
publication of her best-selling 1964 book, A Choice Not An Echo. She
has been a leader of the pro-family movement since 1972, when she started
her national volunteer organization Eagle Forum. In a ten-year battle, Mrs. Schlafly led the pro-family
movement to victory over the principal legislative goal of the radical feminists,
called the Equal Rights Amendment. An articulate and successful opponent of the
radical feminist movement, she appears in debate on college campuses more
frequently than any other conservative. She
was named one of the 100 most important women of the 20th century by the Ladies’
Home Journal. Phyllis can be reached
at her Clayton, MO Eagle Forum office located at 7800 Bonhomme Ave. or by
calling (314)721-1213 and via email at Phyllis@EagleForum.org.