Darwinism:
The Imperialism of Biology?
By
Ben Stein
Let’s make this short and sweet. It would be
taken for granted by any serious historian that any ideology or worldview would
partake of the culture in which it grew up and would also be largely influenced
by the personality of the writer of the theory.
No less a genius than the evil Karl Marx noted
that even after capitalism succumbed to Communism, society would still be
imbued with the class artifacts and cultural values of the system that preceded
it.
Much smarter analysts than I have noted that the whole system of Marxism,
especially its sharp attacks on capitalists as a class, was motivated by Karl
Marx’s envy of the much wealthier industrialist/capitalist members of the
Marx family.
In other words, major theories do not arise
out of thin air. They come from the era in which they arose and are influenced
greatly by the personality and background of the writer. (In law, this theory
is known as “legal realism.” Judges make up their minds on the basis of their
prejudices and then rationalize their decisions by pretending to be bound by
prior case law. One might call what happens with ideologies “political
realism.” Persons make up their ideologies based on their times and their life
situations.)
Darwinism, the notion that the history of
organisms was the story of the survival of the fittest and most hardy, and that
organisms evolve because they were/are stronger and more dominant than others,
is a perfect example of the age from which it came: the age of Imperialism.
When Darwin wrote, it was received wisdom that the white, northern European man
was destined to rule the world. This could have been rationalized as
greed–i.e., Europeans simply taking the resources of nations and tribes less
well organized than they were. It could have been worked out as a form of
amusement of the upper classes and a place for them to realize their martial
fantasies. (Was it Shaw who called Imperialism “...outdoor relief for the upper
classes?”)
But it fell to a true Imperialist, from a
wealthy British family on both sides, married to a wealthy British woman,
writing at the height of Imperialism in the UK, when a huge hunk of Africa and
Asia was ‘owned’ (literally, owned, by Great Britain) to create a scientific
theory that rationalized Imperialism. By explaining that Imperialism worked
from the level of the most modest organic life up to man, and that in every
organic situation, the strong dominated the weak and eventually wiped them out.
Darwin offered the most compelling argument
yet for Imperialism. It was neither good nor bad, neither Liberal nor
Conservative, but simply a fact of nature. In dominating Africa and Asia,
Britain was simply acting in accordance with the dictates of life itself. He
was the ultimate pitchman for Imperialism.
Now, we know that Imperialism had a short
life span. Imperialism was a system that took no account of the realities of
the human condition. Human beings do not like to have their countries owned by
people far away in ermine robes. They like to be in charge of themselves. Imperialism
had a short but hideous history–of repression and murder. But its day is done.
However, Darwinism is still very much alive,
utterly dominating biology. Despite the fact that no one has ever been able to
prove the creation of a single distinct species by Darwinist means, Darwinism
dominates academia and the media. Darwinism also has not one meaningful word to
say on the origins of organic life, a striking lacuna in a theory supposedly
explaining life.
Alas, Darwinism has had a far bloodier life
span than Imperialism. Darwinism, perhaps mixed with Imperialism, gave us
Social Darwinism, a form of racism so vicious that it countenanced the
Holocaust against the Jews and mass murder of many other groups in the
name of speeding along the evolutionary process.
Now, a few scientists are questioning
Darwinism on many fronts. I wonder how long Darwinism’s life span will be? Marxism, another theory which, in true Victorian style,
sought to explain everything, is dead everywhere but on university campuses and
in the minds of psychotic dictators. Maybe Darwinism will be different. Maybe
it will last. But it’s difficult to believe it will. Theories that presume to
explain everything without much evidence rarely do. Theories that outlive their
era of conception and cannot be verified rarely last
unless they are faith based. And Darwinism has been such a painful, bloody
chapter in the history of ideologies, we would be better off without it as a
dominant force.
Maybe we would have a new theory: We are just
pitiful humans. Life is unimaginably complex. We are still trying to figure
it out. We need every bit of input we can get. Let’s be humble about what
we know and what we don’t know, and maybe in time, some answers will come.
Publisher’s Note...
I agree with Ben except for the latter part of his last sentence.
We already have the answers and, though some people might prefer to call it a
theory, I believe it’s a fact. The answers and facts can be found in the book
of Genesis. It starts out...“In the beginning God created the heavens and the
Earth.
Ben Stein, the lovable, monotone teacher from the movie Ferris
Bueller’s Day Off
and The Wonder Years is also a lawyer,
economist, former presidential speechwriter, author and social commentator.
His documentary film EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed opens in theaters nation wide on April 18th.
This is a MUST SEE film - so spread the word. For more information regarding
EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed
visit www.expelledthemovie.com.