The Sin of Intellectualism

By Daniel E. Wrigley, Esq.

 

    One of this nation’s oldest and most respected educational institutions is Harvard University.  Harvard was founded only 16 years after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock and is named after its first major benefactor, John Harvard, a minister at Charlestown, Massachusetts that left his entire library and half of his estate to the school.

    There can be no doubt that, like nearly all of the first 100 universities in America, Harvard was founded on the Christian faith.  A perusal of the section on Harvard University in Bill Federer’s America’s God and Country Encyclopedia of Quotations reveals that Harvard was founded to “train a literate clergy,” the founders believed that “all knowledge without Christ was vain,” and that the word “Veritas” which appears on the seal of the University means “divine truth.”

    Further support of Harvard’s Christian foundation is evident from a speech by Josiah Quincy, Harvard’s President from 1829 -1845 wherein he is quoted as having said “Human happiness has no perfect security but freedom; freedom none but virtue, virtue none but knowledge; and neither freedom, virtue, nor knowledge has any vigor or immortal hope, except in the principle’s of the Christian faith and in the sanctions of the Christian religion.”

    But, despite this Christian foundation of the University, Harvard’s Christian moorings were loosed about the time of America’s Industrial Revolution when its administration began to acknowledge the French philosophy of positivism and the Religion of Humanity.  It was at that time that Harvard Law School applied positivism to the law and propagated the notion that judges should interpret the Constitution in a manner that evolves to meet the needs of a changing society.

    This intellectual rebellion came to a full head and boiled over nearly a century ago when Harvard defiantly threw off the “shackles of faith” as evidenced by the message of its 1908 Class Poem entitled “Man” which screamed of pagan intellectualism in stanzas saying things such as “Out of the Church’s prison, the new Christ re-arisen!,” and “Mankind, the Christ, retried, re-crowned, re-crucified; No god for a gift, God gave us, Mankind alone must save us.”

 

God or No God

    A culture war then engaged between the competing ideologies of intellectualism and faith in the Living God.  As with most other wars, this culture war I speak of is about freedom -- both sides are seeking freedom from God.  But, lest any reader might be confused about this, bear in mind that even though both sides desire freedom from God, it’s different kinds of freedom that they want.

    The freedom from God which one ideology seeks is that which will banish a perceived fictitious authority from their lives, thus allowing them to pursue their life interests without any sort of moral restraint except that which they might be unable to persuade a jury of their peers and a Supreme Court majority to reject.  The freedom from God which the other ideology seeks is that which acknowledges God as the ultimate authority in their lives and recognizes that Being as the source from which all freedoms are derived.

    In essence, these opposing ideologies are warring over whether God really exists and if so, how that belief, or lack thereof, should impact our social institutions.  For simplicity’s sake, I’ll refer to each of the competing ideologies as the “Intellectuals” and the “Believers.”  I think you’ll know which label applies to each side.

 

War Strategy

    As their label implies, the Intellectuals are no dummies. They knew that this culture war was a spiritual one and that they could never win it by first attempting to infiltrate the Church. Strategic planning was necessary if they were going to have any success at re-fabricating our social structure.
    So, rather than attacking the Believers on their home turf, the Intellectuals sought a distant part of their realm in which to openly attack. The political arena seemed like a good choice, with the hallmark virtues of freedom of speech and open debate providing an unobstructed platform for even the most peculiar of views.

    But upon realizing that the composition of legislators in Congress included nearly as many Believers as were in the composition of the Church, the Intellectuals decided that Congress wasn’t a very good place to start. And, neither was the executive office, as they learned the legacy of Christian faith left by American Presidents provided ample evidence that no candidate, irrespective of political party, would ever have any realistic possibility of being elected President without having appeal to Believers who filled the voting booths every election.

    The Intellectuals realized that they would have to circumvent the influence of Believers in the political process and eventually establish a way to convert them to their way of thinking in order to stand a chance at the ballot box. The strategy they adopted to accomplish this dual goal was to rely on the judiciary throughout the states to remove biblical influence from the public schools.

    The judiciary was the perfect choice to effect this change in that the Intellectuals had graduated a goodly flock of lawyers who were filling the judiciary in states across the nation who understood and embraced their ideology. The judiciary was also a good choice because judges are most often appointed rather than elected and, once seated, are not easily removed. The public schools were a good choice as the first forum because the Intellectuals understood that not only could they indoctrinate children to their way of thinking but also disrupt the stability of families which were producing so many future Believers.

    So, the Intellectuals sought a case in which to begin deconstructing the public school system in order to chip away at the Rock of Faith upon which the schools were founded. The first opportunity they chose was to challenge a Tennessee statute which prohibited the teaching of anything other than the Biblical account of Creation in its curriculum.  Although violation of the statute only amounted to a misdemeanor resulting in a fine of $100, the Intellectuals hyped-up the media and used the case as a platform in which to have a national debate on the matter of science versus faith.

    In what came to be known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, Intellectuals clashed with Believers. The trial resulted in John Scopes being convicted. But even though Intellectuals had lost the battle, they were nonetheless were victorious in the sense that the case escalated the culture war to the forefront of our national conscience.

    Having successfully made a crack in the Rock of Faith, the Intellectuals went on to challenge other such statutes and issues over the years since then. In the case of Everson v. Board of Education of Eweing Tp., the Intellectuals persuaded the United States Supreme Court that government monies received by a Catholic school to assist in the daily transportation costs it incurred in getting students to its school was a violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution in that it was tantamount to an establishment of religion. It was this case that birthed the Constitutional doctrine of ‘Separation of Church and State.’

    The Intellectuals then sought to make more of a direct hit on faith itself than what they had in Everson where their attack was more an administrative issue. From there the Intellectuals went on to attack school prayer and Bible reading under the mantel of ‘Separation of Church and State.’  It was easy picking from there as the Intellectuals went on to score victories in removing the 10 Commandments from public schools, prohibiting prayer at football games and graduation ceremonies, and a host of other such issues.

 

Battling Back

    Believers now find their families in chaos and disarray from the advancing Intellectual rebellion to the point where they are about to entirely lose the culture war. Although Believers have managed to gain a few small victories along the way, they have finally caught on to the reality that if they are ever going to accomplish more than successfully defending the remaining vestiges of America’s Christian heritage, they will need to adopt the same approach by which the Intellectuals have accomplished their gain. That is, the Believers will have to reclaim the educational territory to see that their children will not be swept away from the faith established in them by the Church.

    As witnessed by the Intellectuals coup-de-tau, this will not be accomplished overnight, but will take a lot of time and strategy if Believers are to be successful. Numerous strategies have already received a lot of attention in the past few years, some of which have already been implemented.

    One such strategy is the home schooling initiative whereby parents come to understand their Godly duty to teach their children, not only the ways of God, but also the various academic disciplines which are typically taught in the public schools. The success of this initiative has already been revealed by the number of home schooled students who have received national recognition for their high achievement in standardized test scores and various academic competitions.

    Another initiative which has shown some success is one in which parents pull their children from the public schools to enroll them in private ones.  The Southern Baptist Convention drew a lot of attention recently when it officially adopted a resolution declaring that its member families should immediately take this approach and pursue other educational methods.

    Without denying the efficacy of home schooling or private schools, many Believers are nonetheless sending their children to the public schools. There could be many reasons for this. Some Believers may not feel that they are qualified or prepared to teach their children all of the academic disciplines that they would receive in the public school. But, the home schooling initiative has been around quite a while now, and there are several conferences and conventions available from which dedicated parents may gain confidence in their teaching abilities as well as quality curriculum and other materials.
    Other Believers may find the cost of private schools to be prohibitive. This limitation could be removed, however, by the enactment of some sort of voucher system allowing families to direct government funding to the school of their choice. But given the political quagmire which has resulted thus far from the debate of a voucher system, it doesn’t appear that vouchers will be a viable solution to the problem of financing a private school education anytime soon.

    There could be a plethora of other social factors which might deter Believers from pulling their children from the public schools as well. Sadly, one such example would be the need of a single mother or father with custody of children to use public schools and their related programs as a sort of a daycare operation to enable the parent to work. Or, the children themselves might object to leaving the public schools if they are comfortable there or can’t bear the thought of severing friendships.

    One thing is certain, however. In light of the rate at which our Godly heritage is being wiped away and the social turmoil we have in this country today which has been caused by the Intellectual rebellion, Believers must act quickly to reverse the effects of the rebellion. While educational alternatives for their children are the key, this country which had once blossomed into the home of God’s children, will be no more unless Believers seek the power of the Holy Spirit in this cause. Therefore, Believers must turn to God’s Word to seek out answers on what to do to have an immediate impact in the education of their children.

 

Godly Wisdom is the Key

    Much of the curricula in the public schools, colleges, and universities today is only focused on the technical aspects of knowledge and a regimented approach to teaching. While these learning institutions may crank out graduates who are highly skilled and intelligent in their particular fields of study, many of them nonetheless do not understand the world around them. The reason for this is that aside from the knowledge they may have received in these schools they have not received or learned true wisdom.

    Speaking for the Lord, the prophet Hosea cried out to ancient Israel that the Lord was at controversy with them and that they would be destroyed for lack of knowledge.  What do you think He meant?  Did He mean that because the Israelites hadn’t excelled at mathematics, science, and language that their nation would crumble because of that? Hardly. The words of the prophet were clear and understandable. They would be destroyed because they had rejected the knowledge of God and forgotten His law.

    In his 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster puts forth a rather lengthy definition of wisdom. Webster begins by saying that “wisdom is the right use or exercise of knowledge; the choice of laudable ends, and of the best means to accomplish them. This is wisdom in act, effect, or practice. If wisdom is to be considered as a faculty of the mind, it is the faculty of discerning or judging what is most just, proper and useful, and if it is to be considered as an acquirement, it is the knowledge and use of what is best, most just, most proper, most conducive to prosperity or happiness.”  And, he goes on to say that “In Scripture theology, wisdom is true religion; godliness; piety; the knowledge and fear of God, and sincere and uniform obedience to His commands. This is the wisdom which is from above. Psalm 90. Job 28.”

    The Bible tells us that the wisest man who ever lived was Solomon, son of King David and the third to sit upon the throne of Israel. Most will remember Solomon for his judgment in the case of two women who claimed that they each were the mother of a certain child. In his proverbs, Solomon said that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and tells us that we are to receive the instruction of wisdom, justice, judgment, and equity.

    Just before the children of Israel were to enter into the Promised Land, God spoke through Moses to say that they should be diligent to teach the wisdom and knowledge of God to their children, and through Solomon He admonishes children to hear the instruction of a father and attend to know understanding.

    The message is clear.  All of the knowledge a person may have or receive from today’s educational institutions is nothing without Godly wisdom to enable someone to effectively use that knowledge for good.  Children have a duty to hear the instruction of their father or mother and the parents have a duty to teach Godly wisdom to them.
    Well, are we?  Are we making time in our busy schedules to fulfill this God-given duty, or are we busy with entertainment, athletics, or other personal pursuits?  If we give a hoot about our children and the future of our nation but are distracted by these worldly things from our duty to teach wisdom and the knowledge of God, we had better make some changes fast. The first thing we would have to do is be sure that we know or have Godly wisdom to teach to our children.

    The Bible clearly tells us that there are different kinds of wisdom - the wisdom of God and the wisdom of this world. Apostle Paul addresses this in his first writing to the Church at Corinth. The city of Corinth was a little brother to Athens, which was the pinnacle of intellectualism at that time.

    Paul, himself perhaps one of the most intellectual persons of his time, wrote to correct the Corinthians who were self-destructing over intellectualism in the Church.  In correcting them, Paul says that the wisdom of this world is as foolishness to God and that the foolishness of God is wiser than men. He also reveals that God will destroy the wisdom of the wise and that the preaching of the cross, which is foolishness to those that perish, is the power of God.

    So, how was it that Solomon came to have such Godly wisdom? Well, he was probably pretty bright to begin with, but as he was about to succeed to the throne of Israel he humbly prayed to God for wisdom and knowledge that he might rightly judge and rule over those whom God had made him king. God gracefully granted Solomon’s prayer, and told him that because his heart was so humble, He would give him riches, wealth and honor as no other kings have had. Wow!  That sounds like a great program. Sign me up.

    That shouldn’t sound like such a foreign idea to us, however. Most readers will recall a very familiar phrase which Jesus gave to us in His Sermon on the Mount - “Seek ye first the kingdom of God, and His righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.”

    So, with such a great promise, what are we waiting for? Do we lack enough faith to think that God is unable to fulfill His promises?  I think not.  I think that we may have enough faith to pull this off, but I’m not sure that we’re willing to leave a few things behind and make enough time to do it.

    When will we turn the television off and open the Bible? When will we pass on going to the ball game with our friends and co-workers and stay home to teach our children not to be conformed to this world, but to bring into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ?

    Will tonight be the night? It’s up to you!


 

    Dan Wrigley is a licensed attorney at law in Illinois and Missouri. He is also Founder and Chairman of the American Institute for Judeo-Christian Values (AIJCV), a not-for-profit ministry which he organized to proclaim the Gospel of Christ and promote the reconstruction and preservation of a Christian culture in America. For more information regarding the AIJCV visit their website at www.aijcv.org or call (618) 346-4707 or toll free (866) 245-2876. Dan can also be reached via e-mail at info@aijcv.org.