How Long
Were the Days of Genesis 1?
By Russell Grigg
Were
the days of Creation Week of 24 hours duration or were they long periods of
time? This article will discuss the Hebrew time words which the author had
available to him and what meaning he intended to convey by his choice of the
specific words he used.
The Meaning of Yōm
When Moses,
under the inspiration of God, compiled the account of creation in Genesis 1, he used the Hebrew word ‘yōm’ for “day.” He combined yōm with numbers (first day, second day, third day, etc.)
and with the words “evening” and “morning,” and the first time he employed
it he carefully defined the meaning of yōm (used
in this way) as being “one night/day cycle”
(Genesis 1:5). Thereafter, throughout the
Bible, yōm
used in this way always refers to a normal 24–hour day. There is thus a prima facie case that, when God used the word yōm in this way, He intended to convey that the days
of
creation were 24 hours long.
Let us
now consider what other words God could have used, if He had wanted to convey a
much longer period of time than 24 hours.
Hebrew Time Words
There
are several Hebrew words which refer to a long period of time.
These include ‘qedem,’ which is the main one --
word term for “ancient” and is sometimes translated “of old;” ‘olam’
means “everlasting” or “eternity” and is translated “perpetual,” “of old.”
or “forever;” ‘dor’ means “a revolution of time”
or “an age” and is sometimes translated “generations;” ‘tamid’ means “continually” or “forever”; ‘ad’ means “unlimited
time” or “forever;” ‘orek’ when used with ‘yōm’ is translated “length of days;” ‘shanah’
means “a year” or “a revolution of time” (from the change of seasons); ‘netsach’ means “forever.” Words for a shorter time span include
‘eth’ (a general term for “time”); and ‘moed,’ meaning
“seasons” or “festivals.” Let us consider how some of these could have been
used.
1. Event of Long Ago
If God
had wanted to tell us that the creation events took place a long time in the
past, there were several ways He could have said it:
yamim (plural of yōm) alone or with evening and morning, would have meant “and
it was days of evening and morning.” This would have been the simplest way, and
could have signified many days and so the possibility of a vast age.
qedem by itself or with ‘days’
would have meant “and it was from days of old.”
olam with ‘days’ would also have meant “and it was from
days of old.” So, if God had intended to communicate an ancient creation to us,
there were at least three constructions He could have used to tell us this.
However, God chose not to use any of these.
2. A Continuing Event
from Long Ago
If God
had wanted to tell us that creation started in the past but continued into the
future, meaning that creation took place by some sort of theistic evolution,
there were several ways He could have said it:
dor
used either alone or with days, days and nights, or evening and morning, could
have signified “and it was generations of days and nights.” This would have
been the best word to indicate evolution's alleged aeons,
if this had been meant.
olam
with the preposition le, plus “days
or evening and morning” could have
signified “perpetual;” another construction le olam va-ed
means “to the age and onward” and is
translated “forever and ever” in Exodus 15:18.
tamid
with days, days and nights, or evening and morning, could have signified and it was the continuation of days.
ad used either
alone or with olam
could have signified “and it was for ever.”
shanah
(year) could have been used figuratively for “a long time,” especially in the
plural.
yōm rab
literally means “a long day” (cf. “long
season” in Joshua 24:7, or “long time”
in the New American Standard Bible).
This construction could well have been used by God if He had meant us to understand
that the days were long periods of time.
Thus,
if God had wanted us to believe that he used a long, drawn–out creative
process, there were several words He could have used to tell us this. However,
God chose not to use any of these.
3. Ambiguous Time
If God
had wanted to say that creation took place in the past, while giving no real
indication of how long the process took, there were ways He could have done it:
yōm
combined with “light and darkness,” would have signified “and it was a day of
light and darkness.” This could be ambiguous because of the symbolic use of
light and darkness elsewhere in the Old
Testament. However, yōm with “evening and
morning,” especially with a number preceding it, can never be ambiguous.
eth (time)
combined with “day and night” as in Jeremiah 33:20 and Zechariah 14:7 could have been ambiguous. Likewise eth combined
with “light and darkness” (a
theoretical construction). If any of these forms had been used, the length of
the days of creation would have been widely open for debate. However, God chose
not to use any of these.
Author’s Intention
The
following considerations show us what God intended us to understand:
1. The meaning of any part of the Bible must be decided in terms of the intention
of the author. In the case of Genesis,
the intention of its author clearly was to write a historical account. This
is shown by
the
way in which the Lord Jesus Christ and the Apostle Paul regarded Genesis—that is, they quoted it as being
truth, not symbolic myth or parable. It was
plainly not the author's intention
to convey allegorical poetry, fantasy, or myth. And so what God, through Moses,
said about creation in Genesis should
not be interpreted in these terms.
Moses
did, in fact, use some of the above long–time words (italicized in the examples
below, with root Hebrew words in square brackets), although not with reference
to the days of creation. For example, in Genesis
1:14, he wrote, Let there be lights
... for seasons [moed]; in Genesis 6:3, My spirit shall
not always [olam] strive with man; in Genesis
9:12 for perpetual generations [olam dor]; in Leviticus 24:2, to burn continually [tamid]; in Numbers 24:20 that he perish for ever [ad]; in Deuteronomy 30:20, He is thy
light and the length of thy days [yōm orek]; in Deuteronomy
32:7, Remember the days of old [yōm olam]; and so on.
Why did
God not use any of these words with reference to the creation days, seeing that
He used them to describe other things? Clearly it was His intention that the
creation days should be regarded as being normal earth-rotation days, and it
was not His intention that any longer time–frames should be inferred.
James
Barr, a professor of Hebrew at Oxford University, agrees that the words used in
Genesis 1 refer to “a series of six days which were the same as
the days of 24 hours we now experience,” and he says that he knows of no
professor of Hebrew at any leading university who would say otherwise.
2. Children have no problem in
understanding the meaning of Genesis.
The only reason why other ideas are entertained is because people apply
concepts from outside the Bible,
principally from evolutionary/atheistic sources, to interpret the Bible.
3. The Bible is God's message to mankind and as such it makes
authoritative statements about reality. If one removes any portion of the Bible from the realm of reality, God may
still be communicating truth to us, but the reader can never be sure that he
understands it as the author intended. Furthermore, if God's communication to
us is outside our realm of reality, then we cannot know whether any account in
the Bible means what the words
actually say or whether it means something entirely different, beyond our
understanding. For example, if we apply this criterion to the accounts of the
resurrection of Jesus, perhaps the words could mean that Jesus did not rise
from the dead physically, but in a way beyond our comprehension. When these
sorts of word–games are played with the Bible,
the Bible loses its authority, we
lose the divine perspective on reality, and Christianity loses its
life–changing power.
4. If the days really weren't ordinary
days, then God could be open to the charge of having seriously misled His
people for thousands of years. Commentators universally understood Genesis in a straightforward way, until
attempts were made to harmonize the account with longs ages and then evolution.
Conclusion
In Genesis 1, God, through the pen of
Moses, is going out of His way to tell us that the days of creation were literal earth–rotation days. To do this, He
used the Hebrew word yōm,
combined with a number and the words “evening and morning.” If God had wanted
to tell us it was an ancient creation, then there were several good ways He
could have done so. If theistic evolution had been intended, then there were
several constructions He could have used. If the time factor had been meant to
be ambiguous, then the Hebrew language had ways of saying this. However, God
chose not to use any construction
which would have communicated a meaning other than a literal solar day.
The only
meaning which is possible from the Hebrew words used is that the days of creation
were 24–hour days. God could not have communicated this meaning more clearly
than He did in Genesis 1. The Divine
confirmation of this, if any is needed, is Exodus 20:9-11, where the same word “days” is used throughout: “Six days shalt thou
labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day
is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, not thy daughter,
thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that
is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea,
and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed
the sabbath day, and hallowed it.”
![]()
Russell Grigg lives
in Brisbane Australia and is a staff member of Creation Ministries International
(CMI). He writes scientific and theological articles for Creation Magazine, edits
articles and books written by others, and reviews books and videos on creation
topics submitted to CMI from overseas.