|
Eagle
Forum
CWA
of Missouri
Concerned
Women for America
American
Family Association of Missouri
American Family Association
America
Asleep kNOw More
Truths
That Transform
CasiNO
Watch
For
Faith and Family
Christian Coalition Worldwide
He's
Got the Whole
World in His Hands
Institute
For Creation Research
Birthright
Small
Victories
National
Right To Life
The Ultimate Pro-Life
Resource List
Missouri
Right To Life
WallBuilders
American
Minute
John Ankerberg
World
Information Center
Turning
Point
Voice
of the Martyrs
The
Christian Defense
(A Christian Chat forum
discussion, questions and answer)
Jews For Jesus
Mission
Gate
Prison
Fellowship Ministries
Pure
Heart Ministries
First
Stone Ministries
Testimonies of Freedom from Homosexuality
WWW Ex-Gay
Internet Links
Homosexuality Ministry Links
|
|
|
New Lembke-Bartle Amendment
Would Ban Human Cloning, Restore Legislative Responsibilities
News Commentary by Jim
Day
|
|
As many readers know, on December 19, 2006
two stalwart champions of life, State Representative Jim Lembke
(R-South St. Louis County) and State Senator Matt Bartle (R-Lee's
Summit, MO) announced
the introduction of a resolution (constitutional amendment) to
ban human cloning in Missouri; something which the incredibly
deceptive Amendment 2 (that was narrowly passed by a 51 to 49
percent margin this past November) failed to do.
Just prior to going to press with our February
Pro-Life issue, we found out that
the initial resolution had been adjusted. According to Rep. Lembke,
the purpose of the new Lembke-Bartle resolution will be two-fold:
1. To restore the legislative responsibilities and prerogatives
of taxation, appropriations, and legislation to their rightful
place, which is under the purview of our duly elected representatives
and, 2. To prohibit ALL HUMAN CLONING in the State of Missouri
and thus close the loophole that was purposefully placed in the
Missouri Constitution via passage of Amendment 2 that permits
human cloning.
At press time the following excerpt was obtained
by the MetroVoice from
the draft text of the new joint resolution which Rep. Lembke and
Sen. Bartle are proposing. (Please be advised that through the
legislative process this language may change.) Excerpt
from the Lembke-Bartle House Joint Resolution:
Section 38(e). 1 At all times, the general assembly of this
state retains the right to enact laws concerning health care research
for the people of this state and to control taxation, appropriations,
and use of public resources for health care research.
2. It is unlawful to use human cloning, or any stem
cells derived from human cloning in stem cell research. For the purpose of this section and section
38(d) of this article, “human cloning” means the creation of a
human embryo by any means other than the fertilization of a human
egg by a human sperm.
3. The provisions of this section supersede any provision
of section 38(d) of this article that is inconsistent with this
section.
Go
to Article
|
|
Eight
Reasons Why Abortion is Bad for Women
By Georgette Forney
|
|
Women from the National Organization of Women scoffed at
me as I held my homemade sign that
said “I Regret Choosing Abortion.”
As I walked away I thought of all the people who had contacted
me, seeking help for the pain, shame and guilt they felt for having
abortions.
That’s when the seed
for the Silent No More Awareness
Campaign was planted. Since that day, Priests for Life and
Anglicans for Life have worked to raise awareness about the devastating
effect abortion has on women and men. We want to expose the secrecy
and silence surrounding abortion and heal the pain. I’ve learned
that personal experience outweighs theories discussed by policy
makers and judges. I’ve also identified the top eight reasons
why abortion is harmful to women, which are as follows:
1. Abortion is bad for women because it creates
more problems than it solves.
After an abortion many women find themselves dealing with
increased use of drugs and/or alcohol to deaden their pain, reoccurring
insomnia and nightmares, eating disorders, suicidal feelings,
and many even attempt suicide. Difficulty in maintaining or developing
relationships. Loneliness, isolation, anger, fears of the unknown,
indecisiveness and a sense of self-hatred. Since 2001, 15 studies have focused on the psychological
affects of abortion. These studies underscore the fact that evidence-based
medicine does not support the conjecture that abortion will protect
women from ‘serious danger’ to their mental health. It indicates
just the opposite! For
instance, Kathy had a saline abortion. A saline solution was injected
into her fetus’s body, poisoning him to death. Kathy never grieved
her abortion, and when she had children she began to experience
intrusive thoughts about poisoning them. Very gentle and soft-spoken,
Kathy was terrified. She sought counseling, and identified the
root: her saline abortion. Her mourning over her abortion had
mutated into these intrusive thoughts as a way to re-live her
emotional experience. They stopped once she admitted her pain,
and grieved her abortion. Though most women who have abortions
do not act upon these intrusive thoughts, their torment affects
their mental health and their relationship with their living children.
Go
to Article
|
|
|

St.
Louis Mini Worldview Weekend February 10
Courtship Conference
February 16-17
Planned Parenthood:
A Commentary on its History and Philosophy
Life Issues Entangled
in Missouri Budget Battle
Made
in the Image of God
Harm Done
Swimming Up Stream
Stem
Cells - Does Their Origin Matter?
Growing
a Pro-Life Church
Alliance
For Life - Missouri On the Move and Growing
Are
You a Christian or a Christ Follower?
The Decline of a Nation
Kerry Messer to Represent
AUL in Missouri Legislature
Overlooked
|