New Lembke-Bartle Amendment Would Ban Human
Cloning and Restore Legislative Responsibilities

News Commentary by Jim Day

 

    As many readers know, on December 19, 2006 two stalwart champions of life, State Representative Jim Lembke (R-South St. Louis County) and State Senator Matt Bartle (R-Lee's Summit, MO) announced the introduction of a resolution (constitutional amendment) to ban human cloning in Missouri; something which the incredibly deceptive Amendment 2 (that was narrowly passed by a 51 to 49 percent margin this past November) failed to do.

    Just prior to going to press with our February Pro-Life issue, we found out that the initial resolution had been adjusted. According to Rep. Lembke, the purpose of the new Lembke-Bartle resolution will be two-fold: 1. To restore the legislative responsibilities and prerogatives of taxation, appropriations, and legislation to their rightful place, which is under the purview of our duly elected representatives and, 2. To prohibit ALL HUMAN CLONING in the State of Missouri and thus close the loophole that was purposefully placed in the Missouri Constitution via passage of Amendment 2 that permits human cloning.

    At press time the following excerpt was obtained by the MetroVoice from the draft text of the new joint resolution which Rep. Lembke and Sen. Bartle are proposing. (Please be advised that through the legislative process this language may change.)

    Excerpt from the Lembke-Bartle House Joint Resolution:

    Section 38(e).  1 At all times, the general assembly of this state retains the right to enact laws concerning health care research for the people of this state and to control taxation, appropriations, and use of public resources for health care research.

    2. It is unlawful to use human cloning, or any stem cells derived from human cloning in stem cell research.  For the purpose of this section and section 38(d) of this article, “human cloning” means the creation of a human embryo by any means other than the fertilization of a human egg by a human sperm.

    3. The provisions of this section supersede any provision of section 38(d) of this article that is inconsistent with this section.

 

A True Ban on Human Cloning
    Paragraph 2 of the new Lembke-Bartle resolution is aimed in part at correcting the deception of Subsection 6(2) in Amendment 2 which reads: “Clone or attempt to clone a human being means to implant in a uterus…anything other than the product of fertilization of an egg…by a sperm.” This is a false definition of cloning. Cloning has nothing to do with implantation in a uterus. The cloning of a human being occurs BEFORE implantation, and the cloned human being is a cloned human being whether he or she is implanted or not.

    Also, to say that a 10 to 12 day old embryo (created through a cloning procedure) is not a clone in the research lab, when the very same embryo would be a clone if it had been implanted in a uterus is ludicrous.

    To clone means “to create a genetic copy of.” This is accomplished by a procedure termed “somatic cell nuclear transfer.”  In somatic cell nuclear transfer, a donor cell nucleus containing the complete human genetic code is transferred into a human egg whose own nucleus has been removed, thereby creating a cloned embryo. The false definition of cloning in Amendment 2 is intentionally contrived to exclude somatic cell nuclear transfer from the definition of cloning, when in fact somatic cell nuclear transfer is the technical term for cloning.

    The true definition of cloning is universally accepted by leading medical and scientific organizations. The National Academies of Science, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the International Society for Stem Cell Research, and the
American Medical Association recognize somatic cell nuclear transfer as cloning.

    Amendment 2 concocted a false definition of cloning to make the cloning of human beings legal in the State of Missouri.

 

Restoring Legislative Responsibilities

    Paragraph 1 of the new Lembke-Bartle resolution is aimed at Subsections 5 and 7 of Amendment 2.

    Amendment 2’s Subsection 7 states: “The provisions of this section and of all state and local laws, regulations, rules, charters, ordinances, and other governmental actions shall be construed in favor of the conduct of stem cell research and the provision of stem cell therapies and cures. “No state or local governmental body or official shall eliminate, reduce, deny, or withhold any public funds provided or eligible to be provided to a person that (i) lawfully conducts stem cell research or provides stem cell therapies and cures.” Subsection 5 actually expands upon the second sentence of Subsection 7 relating to legislative control of public funding (our tax dollars).

    Representative Lembke stated that one of the new resolution’s objectives was, “to restore the legislative responsibilities and prerogatives of taxation, appropriations, and legislation to their rightful place, which is under the purview of our duly elected representatives.” That’s a nice and diplomatic way to put it. I, however, would put it in different terms.

    I would say that Subsection 7 of Amendment 2 needs to be changed because it is diabolically tyrannical and eliminates the voice of “We the people” through our elected representatives. In my book, this paragraph is a direct assault upon our Constitutional Republican form of government and is totally unconstitutional to begin with.

    Why do I make such a statement? First, we do not live in a dictatorship or fascist state. Privileged, elitist groups – such as the biotech industry, the chamber of commerce or a coalition of university researchers - are not supposed to have total control over the legislative process. Our form of government is called a Constitutional Republic. In a Constitutional Republic we the people elect officials, i.e. our governor, state representatives, state senators, mayors, etc., who are supposed to represent ALL of the people and govern according to the limits placed upon them by the people in accordance with the Constitution that limits their powers. Two of the primary responsibilities which we the people  have delegated to our elected representatives are: 1. To legislate – make and enact laws that, as the Preamble to the Constitution says, “...establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity....;” and 2. To control and have oversight of how and where our tax dollars are spent. Cloning human beings to murder them for their stem-cells is not ‘just’ nor does it promote the general welfare of the people – particularly those who are murdered.

    Subsection 7 of Amendment 2 presently negates BOTH of those responsibilities which we the people have delegated to our elected representatives.

    Allow me to put it in simpler terms. The first sentence of Subsection 7 in Amendment 2 dictates that any state or local law, regulation, rule, ordinance or any other governmental legislative action must favor any type of stem-cell research - which includes embryonic stem-cell research. That means that the reverse – any legislation that is not favorable to all types of stem-cell research – cannot be acted upon by our representatives and thus makes it unconstitutional for we the people to have any input regarding this issue.

    If that’s not bad enough, in addition to removing our elected officials from public policy making on this issue, this tyrannical sentence also puts any dispute as to whether or not any action is deemed ‘unfavorable’ to stem-cell research by the elitists, into the hands of Missouri’s unelected judges to make any final determinations.     Remember folks – this tyranny is now part of the Missouri Constitution!

    The second sentence in the Subsection 7 paragraph (which is bolded above) took away our constitutional rights through our elected representatives to have anything to say about taxation and appropriating funds from the Missouri budget (our tax dollars) regarding all types of stem-cell research.

    Remember, we the people are the government. We elect people to represent us who are supposed to wisely oversee and spend our tax dollars. Amendment 2 removed us from the legislative process by removing our elected representatives from the legislative process. It denies our ability to control where and how our tax dollars are spent when it comes to stem-cell research – which, in the case of Amendment 2, made the cloning of and killing of human beings constitutional.

    Folks, the evil coalition of elitists who spent over $30 million dollars to deceive Missourians into believing that Amendment 2 prohibited human cloning and took away our Constitutional rights of self-government through our elected officials must be stopped. Amendment 2 must be stricken from the books because it is nothing short of tyranny and a death sentence for countless human beings.

    I urge everyone to contact their state representative and state senator and tell them to support State Representative Jim Lembke and Senator Bartle in their efforts to really prohibit human cloning in Missouri and restore your right of self-government through your elected representatives.