Gambling
for Prizes is Still Gambling
Commentary
by Jim Day
On April 20th the Republican-led Missouri
Senate passed SB913, a seemingly innocuous bill which excluded so-called “amusement
devices” from being labeled as “gambling devices.” The ‘devices,’ which the
Senators were trying to protect, look and play like real slot machines but
instead of paying out cash they dole out coupons that
are then exchanged for prizes. They’re known as “slots for tots” because they’re
played primarily by young children and can be found in a lot of Chuck E Cheese
pizza parlors. They’re also totally unregulated.
The gambling industry loves these machines
because they know that if they can psychologically hook kids on gambling at
an early age there’s a high probability that they’ll be coming
back
when they’re old enough to play the real machines for real money.
Fortunately, thanks to the efforts of Mark
and Pat Andrews of CasiNO Watch, Abram Messer with
Missouri Family Network, and some 30 teens and parents of Phyllis Schlafly’s Teen Eagles, SB913 was stopped dead in its tracks
in the House.
Thanks to CasiNO
Watch and Senator Loudon, Ernest Raub, an enforcement
officer with the Missouri Gaming Commission, spent some 40 minutes testifying
before the committee and really opened some eyes to the criminal problems with
these machines. As a result of Raub’s testimony a
letter was sent to Governor Blunt asking him to make shutting down illegal slot
machines a high priority. The following is the press release from Senator
Loudon’s office.
August 1, 2006
Senator
John Loudon, R-Chesterfield, has encouraged Gov. Matt Blunt to make shutting
down illegal slot machines in Missouri a high priority of his administration.
Revelations of the presence of as many as 1,000 such illegal machines, often
unfairly rigged against patrons, sparked a unanimous call for Gov. Blunt’s help. In a unanimous decision, the Joint Committee
on Gaming and Wagering, which is chaired by Loudon, asked the Governor to
implement a strict definition of illegal gambling devices.
“Illegal gambling machines have a negative
impact on Missouri’s economy and are strictly prohibited under state law,”
Loudon said. “Nevertheless, distributors of these devices are rarely
prosecuted. That needs to change.”
Illegal
gambling devices include any gambling machines in which a game of chance is
tied to a valuable reward. They are not overseen by the state and are,
therefore, not subject to taxation. State gambling laws, and prosecutions
against offenders, are under the oversight of the Missouri Attorney General,
according to Section 572.110 of the Missouri Revised Statutes.
Ernest
M. Raub, a gaming enforcement manager for the
Missouri Gaming Commission, testified to the committee, at Loudon’s request,
that illegal gambling machines typically pay out an average of $100-200 per
day, and some average up to $500.
The
business model has machine manufacturers or owners acting as distributors who
aggressively seek establishments in which to place the machines. The proprietor
will pay nothing for the machine, but will split the take with the distributor.
“This
is a business where everyone involved has tricks to cheat everyone else,” Raub said. “It’s ripe for all kinds of abuse and crime.” Payment
of taxes on these profits is considered a rarity.
While
illegal gambling devices operate under Missouri’s legal and economic radar,
they also offer unhealthy opportunities for gambling addicts. The more than
10,000 Missourians who have willingly signed up for the Missouri List of
Disassociated Persons, which bans individuals from being allowed into Missouri
casinos, are provided an opportunity to relapse due to illegal, unregulated and
unaccountable devices.
“The
List of Disassociated Persons is a tool to keep problem gamblers from being
allowed to feed their addiction,” Loudon said. “However, tolerating the
existence of these devices in virtually every county in the state is a
dereliction of our duty to help people as they try to help themselves. Illegal
gambling devices allow individuals who have worked to beat their addiction to
come in through the back door.”
Loudon
called on Missouri officials to take cues from their Illinois counterparts.
Loudon cited Southern Illinois federal court decisions from the 1990s involving
an illicit gaming network that included Amiel Cueto, Thomas Venezia and the
B&H Vending Corporation.
“Illinois
officials have won prosecutions for racketeering, obstruction of justice and
conspiracy to defraud the United States,” Loudon said. “There is no reason why
Missouri should show less resolve than our neighboring states in prosecuting
individuals who are clearly in breach of state and federal laws. This is a
rampant corruption that we appear to be tolerating in Missouri.”
Governor’s Office Replies
Governor Blunt’s
spokesman Spence Jackson responded by stating that the attorney general had
jurisdiction over the matter and would be the proper source for a legal
opinion.
Peter Lobdell,
state supervisor of the Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control, said his
agency had no authority to arrest people or seize illegal gambling machines. He
said the Missouri Gaming Commission’s enforcement powers were limited to places
that serve alcohol and to licensed gambling facilities. Lobdell
also stated that the division is working on recommended changes in law to
clarify responsibility, but that it supports allowing and licensing of certain
machines and gambling activities for fraternal and religious organizations or
similar nonprofit groups. According to Lobdell, such
a change would make it easier for law enforcement to pursue and seize illegal
gambling machines.
Officer Raub
however disagreed and said the scope of the problem is elusive because there’s
no centralized system for reporting illegal gambling activity or the results of
such tips and cautioned against legalizing gambling machines outside of casinos.
“Many of these machines are programmed to cheat the player. I don’t think the
state should be legalizing machines that cheat the player,” he said.
Raub continued by
stating that there would be a ton of problems with legalizing these machines
and said that allowing individual machines in many locations would make it
impossible to control or regulate them.
Gambling for prizes is still gambling. Hopefully
our elected officials will do the right thing and make all
of these prize awarding machines illegal. I guess we’ll see.