Who Were the Puritans?
Publisher’s
Note
People
sometimes get confused as to who actually celebrated what we think of as the
first Thanksgiving. They think the Pilgrims and the Puritans were
the same people -- but they weren’t. The
Pilgrims celebrated Thanksgiving. The Puritans wanted to remain as members
of the Church of England and reform it into a more “pure” form, while the
Pilgrims wanted to be separated from the Church.
In
the following article from Christian History & Biography, Volume 41 The
American Puritans, you’ll get a glimpse
as to who the Puritans were and what they believed. The author, Dr. James.
I. Packer, is on the Board of Governors and is a Professor
of Theology at Regent College in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is
also the author of numerous books, including A Quest for Godliness: The
Puritan Vision of the Christian Life
(Crossway, 1990).
Christian
History & Biography is an excellent
quarterly magazine that can be subscribed to by visiting www.Christianitytoday.com.
I highly recommend it.
Theology on Fire
By James I. Packer
Puritans were not lukewarm about
anything, let alone what they believed about God.
An English Puritan preacher once exhorted his people about their neglect of
the Bible. One hearer reported how
the preacher “personates God to the people, telling them, ‘Well, I have trusted
you so long with my Bible; you have
slighted it, it lies…covered with dust and cobwebs; you care not to listen
to it. Do you use my Bible so? Well,
you shall have my Bible no longer.’
“And he takes up the Bible
from his cushion, and seemed as if he were going away with it and carrying
it from them; but immediately turns again and personates the people to God,
falls down on his knees, cries and pleads most earnestly, ‘Lord, whatever
thou dost to us, take not thy Bible
from us; kill our children, burn our houses, destroy our goods; only spare
us thy Bible, only take not away thy Bible.’
“And then he personates God again to the people: ‘Say you so? Well,
I will try you a while longer; and here is my Bible
for you. I will see how you will use it, whether you will love it more…observe
it more…practice it more, and live more according to it.’ ”
In response, the people broke down and were “deluged with their own
tears.”
This anecdote takes us to the very heart of Puritanism—a passionate
movement, and above all else, a Bible
movement.
Guide
to Holiness
America’s Puritans were English Puritans who had moved to “New England”
in hope of achieving the corporate holiness in church and community that seemed
unattainable
in old England. For half a century, English Puritanism had sought further
purging of England’s national church, plus spiritual renewal for all Englishmen.
The Puritans desired that every person, activity, and relationship might become
“holiness to the Lord.”
In this quest
the Bible was both charter and chart.
Puritans, in their Christ-centered reading of Scripture, stressed the
unity of the two testaments. They placed special significance on the Old Testament as giving God’s blueprint (apart from changes of detail)
for a godly church-state. Christians were to order every part of their lives
according to biblical principles.
The Bible was the Creator’s
personal instruction to every reader, the recorded speech of the Holy Spirit.
So all preaching had to be expository, with teaching and application. All
sermons were to be memorized, with note-taking if necessary; “repeated” (gone
over) at home; and meditated on thereafter.
Also, Christians should brood on Scripture constantly, applying all
it says about relations between God and man. “I never yet observed any part
of a Scripture…” wrote John Cotton, that could not
“be applied both with power and profit and delight to an honest heart.”
Most Puritans saw the sufficiency of Scripture as applying to church
order. Typically, the New England clergyman had gotten into trouble in old
England for requiring that all ceremonies in public worship have scriptural
sanction, and for refusing to conform to some Prayer
Book ceremonies because they lacked it. The New England congregations
were thought of as Anglican at first, but this “regulative principle”—limiting
church order to what Scripture directly sanctioned—changed things. The Prayer Book was not imposed, there were
no bishops, and congregational church government became the pattern.
Good
and Severe God
Puritans saw God scripturally as “the compassionate
and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining
love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet He does
not leave the guilty unpunished …” (Ex. 34:6-7). Puritans found this combination
of goodness and severity, love and holiness, judgment and mercy, both awesome
and adorable.
Thomas Hooker compared the believer’s relationship to God to “a childe
that travels to a Faire with his father.” Even in a crowd, Hooker explained,
“the child’s eye is alwayes upon his father:…the
childe is carefull to keepe his father within
sight and view, and then if hee bee weake and weary, his father can take him by the hand, and
lead him, or take him into his armes and carry him;
or if there be any thing hee wants, or would have,
his father can buy it for him, bestow it upon him.
“But if the childe bee carelesse and gazeth
about this thing and that thing, and never lookes
after his father, hee is gone one way, and his father
another, he cannot tell where to finde him: whose
fault is it now? it is not because his father would
not be within his sight, or because hee could not
keepe within the view of him, but because hee out of carelessnesse lost the
sight of his father.”
Given this view of divine fatherhood, honoring, serving, loving, glorifying,
and enjoying God was to the Puritans the noblest and most joyous life possible.
Cotton Mather wrote in his diary of his deep desire
“to love that which God loves, and hate that which God hates; to bee holy
as God is holy, and like Him, a great Forgiver; and bee His Child, as much
as may bee like the just at the Resurrection from the Dead. This will I seek,
as the noblest Crown, that ever I can wear.”
Vital
Focus
The focus of Puritan preaching was the
regeneration and conversion of people
Salvation began
with regeneration—the supernatural re-creating of a person’s motivational
core. Out of this came conversion—a turning from sin to trust the promise
of justification through the Cross, and to bow to the living Christ as Lord.
Regeneration-conversion was a single sequential process, a work of
grace the Holy Spirit wrought through the message of law and gospel; it was
named “effectual calling.”
Without it,
sincere commitment to God was impossible, because the un-renewed heart was
ruled by the anti-God syndrome called sin. Thomas Hooker explained, “There
was never any saved that was not a rebel first; nor any received to mercy,
that first opposed not the mercies of God, and his grace in Christ.”
The means of this grace were the Word (preached and heard, read and
meditated on) plus prayer. When sought by these means, God would be found,
though he
remains
sovereign over the when and how of the finding process. Regeneration-conversion
brings believers into a covenant relationship: God becomes theirs forever,
guaranteeing to keep them in faith and obedience here and to glorify them
hereafter.
Misunderstandings
American Puritan teaching on salvation
has been misconceived in three ways at least.
1. Covenant
is not a contract. The Puritans are said to have thought of God’s covenant
of grace as a contract; sinners must fulfill its conditions by making a commitment
that precedes regeneration and is not entirely God’s work in them.
Not so! The Puritans saw the covenant as unilaterally established by
God. He alone induces conversion as he works in the heart to give the faith
and repentance he requires.
In Thomas Hooker’s apt words “This is all the Lord requires of us,
namely, to see our sins, to be weary of them, to be content that the Lord
Jesus shall reveal to us what is amiss, and seal a pardon for it, and take
it away; and further give us his grace to take down the old building, and
to set up a new one in us after his image.”
2. Preparation
is not legalism. Puritan teaching on preparation for conversion has been misrepresented
as a legalistic requirement; the sinner must undergo so much self-abasement
and bewailing of sins before being permitted to believe on the Lord Jesus.
Puritans did make much of the preparatory “law-work of conviction,
compunction, and humiliation for sin. But that was simply because through
this work God frees us from our natural love of sinning to embrace Christ.
For Puritans, preparation deals not with the terms of the gospel, but with
the method of grace in the human heart.
3. Changed
life reveals a true conversion. Puritans saw that an unconverted “gospel hypocrite”
might go far in his religiosity and be nearly indistinguishable from someone
regenerate Some have urged that this made it impossible for anyone to be assured
of salvation, for whose heart and life are thoroughly changed?
But the Puritans insisted that desiring to please, glorify, and enjoy
God above everything else—and being willing to endure any loss or pain to
this end—argues a regenerate heart. Their definition is clear, and the formalist’s
failure to match up to it is clear too. Increase Mather
pointed out that “When a man’s heart within him is turned and set against
sin, then he has truly experienced that conversion which the Word of God requireth.”
In sum, for the Puritans, the Christian life was a hungry living out
of God’s grace-gift of salvation. As Thomas Shepard put it, “True grace, as
it comforts, so it never fills, but puts an edge on the appetite; more of
that grace, Lord!”
Faithfulness
in All Things
To practice faithfulness to God as an individual,
a citizen, a worker, a family member, and a unit in the local church—this
was Puritan religion in its essence.
The Puritans believed that unfaithfulness to God would bring judgment.
Old England, having proved unfaithful to its calling, was now facing the barrenness
and disruption of divine judgment. New England, please God, would do better.
The divinely established solidarity of the community was such that
if judgment fell, all would be engulfed together. So neighbor-love and natural
self-love, as well as love of God, should lead all to watch over each other
so as to encourage and help each other toward godliness at all times.
The Puritans valued and intensely strove to live: a personal life of
disciplined law-keeping and self-scrutiny, humble faith and hope, patience,
penitence and prayer; a public life of doing good
and practicing philanthropy wherever possible, while honoring God in one’s
family; a church life of worship and learning from a faithful preacher.
The Puritans held that these actions, done faithfully, would please
God. And when all is said and done, if we are to judge by biblical standards,
it is really impossible to doubt that they were right.