Whose Belief System Shall Govern Us?
By William
J. Federer
The ACLU, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and similar groups, want ‘under God’ taken out of the Pledge of Allegiance, the Ten
|
Commandments
removed from public places, prayer prohibited in schools, and teachers
fired for wearing cross necklaces. At the same time, the ACLU defends
pornography, abortion, polygamy, the North American Man-Boy Love Association,
and printed Getting Hitched in Canada - a guide for
homosexual marriage. These groups state they simply want the government
neutral with regards to ‘religion.’ Their argument sounds reasonable...until
one looks up the definition of ‘religion.’ Definition
of Religion
The Random House Unabridged
Dictionary of the English Language defines ‘religion’ as: “a set
of beliefs.” Webster’s New World Dictionary defines
‘religion’ as: “a system of belief.” The word ‘belief’ is defined as:
“opinions, convictions - thoughts upon which one bases their actions.” Thus,
it follows, that as long as a person is doing ‘actions,’ they
have ‘thoughts’ preceding those actions - and that collection of ‘thoughts’
is that person’s ‘system of belief’ or ‘religion.’ As long as the
government is doing ‘actions,’ the government has ‘thoughts
preceding those actions’ - and that collection of thoughts is
the government’s ‘system of belief’ or ‘religion.’ Can
Never Have Separation
So, there can never really be a separation of ‘religion’ and
government - as long as the government is doing ‘actions’ there are
|
![]() Bill Federer |
thoughts or beliefs underlying those
actions. The ACLU is not trying to be ‘religion neutral,’ but, in fact, is
promoting a religion - a non-deity-based
secular, humanistic system of belief.
Religion
of Secularism
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Abington Township v. Schempp (1963), wrote: “The state may not establish a ‘religion of secularism’ in the sense of affirmatively opposing or showing hostility to religion, thus ‘preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe.’...Refusal to permit religious exercises thus is seen, not as the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism.”
The
U.S. District Court, in Crockett v.
Sorenson (W.D. Va. 1983), wrote: ”The First
Amendment was never intended to insulate our public institutions from any
mention of God, the Bible or
religion. When such insulation occurs, another religion, such as secular
humanism, is effectively established.”
Whose Belief System?
The question is not whether a religion should or should not be in government, the question is whose religion - whose belief system - will be the basis for the government actions.
The
new non-deity-based belief system was
demonstrated as intolerant when winning
‘Deity’
vs ‘Non-deity’ Belief Systems
Belief
in a Supreme Deity was acknowledged in the Declaration
of Independence: “All men are endowed by their CREATOR”; in oaths of office:
“So Help Me GOD”; on coins: “In GOD We Trust”; in the Gettysburg Address: “This
nation, under GOD”, etc. Even the U.S. Supreme Court, in Zorach v. Clauson
(1952), admitted: “Our institutions presuppose a SUPREME BEING.”
Why
A Deity-Based Belief System?
Government
cannot be ‘neutral.’ It will always have thoughts underlying its actions. It
will always have a belief system. It will always have a religion - the question
is whose?
Whose
belief system will be the basis for the government’s actions? If our
founder’s ‘deity-based’ belief system is removed, then the rights, equality and
limited government based on that belief are also removed.
William J. (Bill) Federer is a nationally
acclaimed speaker and best-selling author on